No End in Sight (2007)
"Chronological look at the fiasco in Iraq, especially decisions made in the spring of 2003 - and the backgrounds of those making decisions - immediately following the overthrow of Saddam: no occupation plan, an inadequate team to run the country, insufficient troops to keep order, and three edicts from the White House announced by Bremmer when he took over: no provisional Iraqi government, de-Ba'athification, and disbanding the Iraqi armed services. The film has chapters (from History to Consequences), and the talking heads are reporters, academics, soldiers, military brass, and former Bush-administration officials, including several who were in Baghdad in 2003." -
imdb.com
What troubles me is that while the high ranking officials interviewed point out that there was no planning for the post invation occupation of Irak, it implicitly suggests that that was exactly the plan, but why? Was creating chaos in Irak just the thing they wanted to justify a permanent occupation? Do these neo cons have a soul at all?
'billy' is clearly a wind-up.